tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-148952300031935997.post6442455436309819827..comments2023-10-09T12:05:52.247-06:00Comments on LifeSmart : Questioning Kazlev's RedefinitionsAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09718138217801350798noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-148952300031935997.post-34888535464986058782007-10-23T23:38:00.000-06:002007-10-23T23:38:00.000-06:00Why "fans" and "foes"? The integral movement does ...Why "fans" and "foes"? The integral movement does not = Ken Wilber. This type of language obscures the real significance of "integral" thinking as well as the fine work of the people woring it all out, including Wilber. <BR/><BR/>Upon reading both of the aboved mentioned pieces, I can say two things. First, Perez is right when he points out how Kazlev cites no evidence for his claims, which Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-148952300031935997.post-81076481159034845532007-10-23T16:37:00.000-06:002007-10-23T16:37:00.000-06:00It seems endemic that Wilber foes and fans both la...It seems endemic that Wilber foes and fans both lack the resources to cite sources, not just Kazlev.<BR/><BR/>I agree with Joe that Kazlev only gives opinions without providing context or evidence.<BR/><BR/>Why are people in the "integral movement" so sloppy with both critique and support?<BR/><BR/>Where is the rigor? Whence the coherence?<BR/><BR/>Yours,<BR/><BR/>BAM BAMAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-148952300031935997.post-38590382576324349452007-10-23T08:59:00.000-06:002007-10-23T08:59:00.000-06:00Kazlev's ReplyFrank Visser, the webmaster of Integ...<STRONG>Kazlev's Reply</STRONG><BR/><BR/>Frank Visser, the webmaster of <A HREF="http://www.integralworld.net/" REL="nofollow">Integral World</A>, invited M. Alan Kazlev to reply to Joe's critique. <BR/><BR/><STRONG>READ THAT REPLY: <A HREF="http://www.integralworld.net/kazlev14.html" REL="nofollow">HERE</A></STRONG>Erichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08019941661201257687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-148952300031935997.post-6905768024688291962007-10-22T16:08:00.000-06:002007-10-22T16:08:00.000-06:00Getting clear on the definition for integral."The ...<STRONG>Getting clear on the definition for integral.</STRONG><BR/><BR/>"The term “integral” is vague. As a result of the vagueness of talk about the integral philosophy, questions such as these arise: Is such and such integral? Is this or that something an integral person would say or do? How do you know whether or not such and such is really integral? <BR/><BR/>Defining integral is an importantAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com